Muckle v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 1994
3 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cofer v. Hopper · Gates v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There is nothing in the statute which indicates that the state may introduce testimony regarding the psychological effect of the crime on the victim between the date of the crime and the time of the trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Moore v. Zant“an outgoing, lively type of person to one who is withdrawn, scared, and more nervous.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Moore v. Zant
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.