Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 Ga. App. 835 - Taylor v. Gelfand

233 Ga. App. 835 - Taylor v. Gelfand’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2018

12 state decisions

70199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 226 Ga. App. 459 - Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp. · Department of Human Resources v. Phillips · 221 Ga. App. 592 - Rice v. Huff · 199 Ga. App. 335 - Ingram v. JIK Realty Co. · 227 Ga. App. 591 - Williams v. Stepler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The rule of thumb in determining whether the conduct complained of was sufficiently extreme and outrageous, is whether the recitation of the facts to an average member of the community would arouse her resentment against the defendant so that she would exclaim "Outrageous!" Actionable conduct does not include insults, threats, indignities, annoyances, petty oppressions, or other vicissitudes of daily living but must go beyond all reasonable bounds of decency so as to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community. Factors include the existence of a relationship in which one person has control over another, the actor's awareness of the victim's particular susceptibility, and the severity of the resultant harm. In all events, "major outrage in the language or conduct complained of is essential to the tort."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Whether a claim arises to the requisite level of outrageousness and egregiousness to sustain a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress is a question of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.