Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 ILL 175 - Royal League v. Kavanagh

Royal League v. Kavanagh’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
August 2008
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2008 · most notably Donovan v. City of Dallas (1964), 14 Ill. 2d 356 - James v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad (1958)

7 federal appellate · 44 state decisions

10019081910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 100 Mo. App. 76 - Morton ex rel. Richardson v. Supreme Council of the Royal League · Carson v. Dunham · Wilson v. Joseph · Keyser v. Rice · Harris v. Pullman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is not enough that there may be reason to anticipate a difference of opinion between the two courts, and that the courts of the foreign State would arrive at a judgment different from the decisions of the courts in the State of the residence of the parties. [Citation.] It is not inequitable for a party to prosecute a legal demand against another in any forum that will take legal jurisdiction of the case, merely because that forum will afford him a better remedy than that of his domicile. To justify equitable interposition it must be made to appear that an equitable right will otherwise be denied the party seeking relief. [Citation.]” (Royal League v. Kavanagh, 233 Ill. 175, 183 , 84 N.E. 178, 181 .)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.