233 Ill. 2d 158 - People v. Marker’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
72 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably 238 Ill. 2d 598 - People v. Thompson (2010), 234 Ill. 2d 430 - People v. Garstecki (2009)
72 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 201 Ill. 2d 324 - Robidoux v. Oliphant · 181 Ill. 2d 395 - In Re Estate of Rennick · 224 Ill. 2d 80 - People v. Campbell · 141 Ill. 2d 163 - People v. Mink · 222 Ill. 2d 276 - Vine Street Clinic v. HealthLink, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). The Taylor rule would be meaningless if the preclusive effect it affords could be avoided based merely on a claim that the circuit court's order involved legal error. ¶ 49 B. Rule 606 ¶ 50 The State also argues, however, that its failure to file a timely appeal should be excused under Supreme Court Rule 606 . Rule 606 addresses the perfection of appeals in criminal cases. Rule 606 (b) provides that a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the entry of the judgment or order appealed from or, if a motion for reconsideration is”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.