Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 Ind. 120 - Shutt v. State

Shutt v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1954

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
December 1990
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 1990

18 state decisions

6019541960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kelley v. State · State Ex Rel. Ayer v. Ewing · Witte v. Dowd, Warden · Barr v. State · Goldstine v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The defendant may move to quash the indictment or affidavit when it appears upon the face thereof either: First. That the grand jury which found the indictment had no legal authority to inquire into the offense charged. Second. That the facts stated in the indictment or affidavit do not constitute a public offense. Third. That the indictment or affidavit contains any matter which, if true, would constitute a legal justification of the offense charged, or other legal bar to the prosecution. Fourth. That the indictment or affidavit does not state the offense with sufficient certainty.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘To authorize a life sentence, the previous convictions, sentences and imprisonments must be described specifically, and the jury must find that the defendant was convicted, sentenced and imprisoned in the instances described and not otherwise.’ Kelley v. State (1933), 204 Ind. 612, 616 , 185 N. E. 453, 455 ; Barr v. State (1933), 205 Ind. 481, 485 , 187 N. E. 259 ; Midland v. State (1943), 220 Ind. 668, 670 , 46 N. E. 2d 200 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Then and there being contrary to the form of the Statute, in such cases made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State of Indiana.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.