Barrick v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably Bellmore v. State (1992), Liston v. State (1969)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. . Sullivan · Todd v. State · Foreman v. State · Link v. State · Commonwealth v. Mackey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The term ‘breaking’ as used in our statute denouncing the crime of burglary . . . includes the putting aside of any material part of the building intended as a security against invasion, . . .” Barrick v. State (1954), 233 Ind. 333, 339 , 119 N. E. 2d 550 .”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“"... Whoever breaks and enters into any dwelling-house or other place of human habitation with the intent to commit any felony therein, or to do any act of violence or injury to any human being, shall be guilty of burglary in the first degree, and on conviction thereof shall be imprisoned not less than ten [10] years nor more than twenty [20] years and be disfranchised and rendered incapable of holding any office of trust or profit for any determinate period.” Acts 1941, ch. 148, § 4a, p. 448, being Section 10-701 of Burns’ Ind. Stat. Anno. (1956 Repl.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““It is true that the automobile in this case was parked about a block and a half from the store building, and when apprehended the appellant was not running directly toward it. However, we cannot say as a matter of law that the automobile was too far away to be considered as being ‘on or near the premises’ where the felony was attempted. That question would be one of fact to be determined by the court or jury under the circumstances of each particular case.” Barrick v. State (1954), 233 Ind. 333, 340 , 119 N. E. 2d 550 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lenovich v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.