Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 Iowa 492 - Griffith v. Portlock

Griffith v. Portlock’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2004
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2004

8 state decisions

301942195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] “continuous, open, current account” is one “which is not interrupted or bro ken, not closed by settlement or otherwise, and is a running, connected series of transactions.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.