Jantz v. Beat’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Micheaux v. Amalgamated Meatcutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, Local P-94 · 6 Kan. App. 2d 84 - In Re Estate of Zahradnik · 7 Kan. App. 2d 196 - In Re the Estate of Duncan · 4 Kan. App. 2d 154 - In Re the Estate of Kempkes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Under the statute the filing of such a bond is mandatory. See In re Estate of Kempkes, 4 Kan. App. 2d 154, 159 , 603 P.2d 642 (1979). Still, it has been held mere out-of-time filing of an appeal bond does not defeat appellate jurisdiction where notice of appeal is timely filed because denial of an appeal on technical procedural grounds ‘should not serve as the basis for dismissing the appeal if the interests of justice dictate otherwise.’ In re Estate of Zahradnik, 6 Kan. App. 2d 84, 89 , 626 P.2d 1211 (1981). See also In re Estate of Duncan, 7 Kan. App. 2d 196, 198-99 , 638 P.2d 992 , rev. denied 231 Kan. 800 (1982).” 233 Kan. at 618-619 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.