Lauder v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently October 2011 · most notably Hagans v. State (1989), Maisel v. People (1968)
44 state decisions — followed in 12 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hamilton v. Alabama · White v. State of Maryland · People v. Irrizari · Tellez v. Canton Railroad Co. · Caten v. Salt City Movers & Storage Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * The test is market value, and particularly retail value. People v. Irrizari, 5 N.Y.2d 142 , 182 N.Y.S.2d 361 , 156 N.E.2d 69 ; Jewell v. State, 216 Md. 110, 112 , 139 A.2d 707 . A price tag is a written representation of the price at which the owner offers to sell the article in question. We think it falls squarely within the scope of Code (1957), Art. 35, sec. 59, as a document prepared or entry made in the regular course of business. We have held that section to apply to a wide variety of documents. (Citing cases.) The rule applies in criminal as well as civil cases. Jones v. State, 205 Md. 528, 533 , 109 A.2d 732 . A case closely in point is Caten v. Salt City Movers & Storage Co., 149 F.2d 428, 433 (C.A.2d). See also the article in 45 Mich.L.Rev. 748. We find no error in the admission of the tag in the case at bar. (Emphasis supplied.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. McPhie · Norris v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.