Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

233 Md. 620

195 A.2d 693

Docket [App. No. 63, September Term, 1963.]

Forrester v. Warden

FORRESTER v. WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 12, 1963.

Court of Appeals of Maryland · decided 1963-12-12

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1963-12-12

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably Rios v. Montgomery County (2005), Heron v. Strader (2000)

1 federal appellate · 5 district · 26 state decisions

120196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*621 Before HENDERSON, HAMMOND, HORNEY, MARBURY and SYBERT, JJ.

¶2PER CURIAM:

¶3In his petition for post conviction relief, the applicant contended: (1) the evidence was not sufficient to convict; (2) he was denied due process of law; (3) there was perjured testimony; (4) his statement to the police was involuntary; (5) his arrest was illegal; (6) he was searched without a warrant; and (7) the same counsel should not have been appointed for all defendants because of conflict of interest.

¶4As to all contentions, except (6), the application for leave to appeal is denied for the reasons assigned below. As to contention (6), the application for leave to appeal will also be denied since the petition of the applicant only alleges that he was searched without a warrant at the time of his arrest. There was no allegation, nor any claim in the record, that there was an illegal seizure of any evidence, nor that any such evidence was used against the applicant.

¶5Application denied.

/233/md/620 · .json · Public domain