233 Md. App. 184 - Phillips v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
April 2020
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Frye v. United States · Reed v. State · Rohrbeck v. Rohrbeck · Hoile v. State · Jolley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“law enforcement's use of drive tests for forensic purposes was novel and, thus, subject to the Frye - Reed [ v. State , 283 Md. 374 , 391 A.2d 364 (1978) ] reliability and admissibility standards,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harvey“the State did not establish that drive tests as used by the FBI are generally accepted in the digital forensic science community”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harvey“a litigant may not appeal to an in banc panel when the litigant could not note an appeal to this Court successfully.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Phillips
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.