233 Md. App. 600 - Kranz v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Agurs · Giglio v. United States · Kyles v. Whitley · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · Moore v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is equivalent, under the doctrine of expressio unius , to saying that people who do not meet [the 'custody' requirement] are ineligible”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kranz v. State“(1) confined under sentence of imprisonment; or (2) on parole or probation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kranz v. State“because they are outside the scope if the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kranz v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.