233 Md. App. 88 - Fone v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2258A
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · State v. Albrecht · 24 Md. App. 128 - Andresen v. State · State v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e give 'due regard to the [fact finder's] finding of facts, its resolution of conflicting evidence, and significantly, its opportunity to observe and assess the credibility of witnesses.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Weighing the credibility of witnesses and resolving any conflicts in the evidence are tasks proper for the fact finder.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.