Winters v. Griffis’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 2015
2 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[m]ere passive knowledge of, or acquiescence or consent in, the acts of another is not sufficient to make one liable.... No liability ... attaches merely by reason of testifying as a witness for the prosecution, or by reason of the fact that one's name was indorsed on an indictment or signed to an information or complaint prepared on an independent investigation by the prosecutor.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“defendant must have been the proximate and efficient cause of maliciously putting the law in motion in the original proceedings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.