¶1This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts and questions of law involved are the same as in the case of Walter Dipley, decided at the present term of this court. The petitioner in this case was prosecuted upon an information charging her jointly with said Walter Dipley with murder in the first degree, was convicted of that offense, has appealed to this court, is now confined in the penitentiary' of the State of Missouri, and bases her application for a writ of habeas corpus upon the same facts as were presented to this, court in the Dipley Case. For the reasons given in that case the writ is denied and the petitioner is remanded to the warden of the penitentiary of this State to abide the judgment of this court on the petitioner’s pending appeal.
233 Mo. 241
Ex parte Smith
Decided March 7, 1911
Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1911-03-07
<p>CAPITAL OFFENSE: Appeal: Imprisonment in Penitentiary. A defendant who has been convicted of murder in the first degree and sentenced to life imprisonment in the penitentiary, and who has not been admitted to bail, is not entitled to -remain in the county jail during his appeal, unless there is an order of the proper court or judge finding there is provable cause for such appeal. •</p>
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1928
3 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Petitioner, remanded · Decided 1911-03-07
View the full empirical analysis of this case →