Ewart v. Peniston’s Empirical Analysis
1911
Citation profile
58 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently December 1990 · most notably Lee v. Baltimore Hotel Co. (1939), Bussiere's Admisnistrator v. Sayman (1914)
58 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Aull v. St. Louis Trust Co. · Scott v. Smith · Boyce's Administrator v. Smith's Administrator · Scullin v. Wabash Railroad · Ensor v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Persons desiring to be made parties to a suit before trial can file application to that effect, but after trial the motion for new trial must come from the losing party. Strangers to the record should not be permitted to appear at this point of a proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.