233 N.C. App. 542 - State v. Mee’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Goldberg · State v. McFadden · 200 N.C. App. 204 - State v. Graham · 138 N.C. App. 521 - State v. Montgomery · 179 N.C. App. 647 - State v. Quick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“THE COURT: ... [T]he Court finds as a fact that Mr. Mee is intentionally disrupting these proceedings and intentionally trying to impede his trial. And that was apparent from his demeanor yesterday when I saw him.... So despite Mr. Mee's protestations that he does not understand these proceedings, the Court is of the opinion that he understands these proceedings very well, and just is not recognizing the Court[.] ... He's obstructing these proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the United Nations Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“he was not subject to the court's jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.