Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 N.J. 513 - State v. Twiggs

State v. Twiggs’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Marion · United States v. Ewell · Grunewald v. United States · Toussie v. United States · DiProspero v. Penn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We do not view [statutory] words and phrases in isolation but rather in their proper context and in relationship to other parts of [the] statute, so that meaning can be given to the whole of [the] enactment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “if a literal reading of the statute would yield an absurd result, particularly one at odds with the overall statutory scheme.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.