¶1 Judgment reversed, new trial granted, costs to abide event, on authority of Cahill v. Kleinberg (233 N. Y. 255).
¶2 Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
233 N.Y. 579
135 N.E 926
Cahill v. . Kleinberg
Decided April 18, 1922
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1922-04-18
The action was to recover for loss of services of plaintiff’s wife on account of personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by her through the negligence of defendant. The complaint alleged that while the plaintiff’s wife was descending stairs in the house where she resided, which was owned by defendant, one of the steps broke and she was thrown to the foot of the stairs receiving severe injuries.
Relies on Cahill v. . Kleinberg
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1922-04-18
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 1994
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →