Schug v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Aspen Exploration Corp. v. Sheffield · Braun v. Alaska Commercial Fishing & Agriculture Bank · Witt v. State, Department of Corrections · Prentzel v. State, Department of Public Safety · Charles v. Interior Regional Housing Authority
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We do not decide whether [an assistant attorney general] was protected by absolute or qualified immunity when she represented [the Alaska Department of Corrections] in the underlying litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“will affirm a grant of summary judgment when there are no genuine issues of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“reading the record in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and making all reasonable inferences in its favor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.