People v. Null’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
states following
January 2024
most recently cited
38 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Rhode Island v. Innis · Burks v. United States · Berkemer v. McCarty · People v. Matheny
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the time, place, and purpose of the encounter; (2) the persons present during the interrogation; (8) the words spoken by the officer to the defendant; (4) the officer's tone of voice and general demeanor; (5) the length and mood of the interrogation; (6) whether any limitation of movement or other form of restraint was placed on the defendant during the interrogation; (7) the officer's response to any questions asked by the defendant; (8) whether directions were given to the defendant during the interrogation; and (9) the defendant's verbal or nonverbal response to such directions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“s] position would [have] believe[d] himself to be deprived of his freedom of action to the degree associated with a formal arrest.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“This is an objective inquiry made on a case-by-case basis in light of the totality of the circumstances.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.