233 So. 2d 771 - Evans v. Broadhead’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 2006
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rodman v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. · Price v. Price · Louisville N.R. Co. v. Dixon · 10 La. App. 382 - Matthews v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. · Dunn Const. Co. v. Bourne
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An action for any specific penalty given by this chapter may be prosecuted in any court of competent jurisdiction within twelve months from the time the injury was committed, and not after; and a recovery of any penalty herein given shall not be a bar to any action for further damages, or to any criminal prosecution for any such offense as herein enumerated. A party, if he so elect, may, under any of the provisions of this chapter, claim less than the penalty given.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the plaintiff may commence a new action for the same cause, at any time within one year. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a]ll actions and suits for any penalty or forfeiture on any penal statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.