¶1I concur in the result reached on the sole ground that it was the trial court's province to determine the real purpose of the suit, notwithstanding its form as one in partition; that the recent act of the Legislature (chapter 93, Acts 36th Legislature, p. 152) did not undermine that authority; and that the evidence heard was sufficient to sustain that court's conclusion, *134
233 S.W. 130
Baldwin v. Baldwin
Decided May 11, 1921
Court of Appeals of Texas · decided 1921-05-11
Action by Jacob C. Baldwin and wife against W. L. Baldwin and others. From a judgment sustaining a plea of privilege of the defendant J. T. Trull, plaintiffs appeal.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1921-05-11
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1961
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →