Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 SW 634 - Walker v. Lane

Walker v. Lane’s Empirical Analysis

1921

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
3
states following
July 1976
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 1976

3 state decisions

10192119301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rogers v. Trevathan · Mayo v. Tudor's Heirs · Pryor v. Pendleton · Mitchell v. Porter · Davis v. Mitchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Walker, the original lessee, had the right to procure the drilling of a well by some person other than himself, and the performance of the contract he obtained from Whiteside [his assignee] would have inured to his benefit in preserving the lease in full force and effect as to the 800 acres retained by him, .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.