Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 SW3D 349 - Acosta v. State

Acosta v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio))

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Holloway v. Arkansas · Wood v. Georgia · Mickens v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “actively represented conflicting interests,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.