Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 SW3D 742 - Bath v. Bath

Bath v. Bath’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp. · Thurmon v. Ludy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Consequently and fundamentally, plaintiff needed a contract with a property owner to claim equitable title via equitable conversion. Her only agreement was with Cheney Bath, who had no title. Plaintiff could not acquire and cannot claim title through dealings with a non-owner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.