Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

233 S.W.3d 765

Davis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 25, 2007

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2007-09-25

Decided 2007-09-25

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Brian M. Davis (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment (judgment) denying his Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing, filed pursuant to Rule 24.085.

¶3 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2); Rule 24.085(k). No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/233/sw3d/765 · .json · Public domain