Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 U.S. 157 - United States Upon the Relation and for the Use and Benefit of Texas Portland Cement Company v. D C McCord

United States Upon the Relation and for the Use and Benefit of Texas Portland Cement Company v. D C McCord’s Empirical Analysis

233 U.S. 157 · 1914

Citation profile

433
cited by 433 later decisions
18
cited 18 times by the Supreme Court
19
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

179 federal appellate · 46 district · 73 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 433 later decisions (18 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2019 · most notably United States v. Mayer (1914), Home Ins Co v. Dick (1930)

179 federal appellate · 46 district · 73 state decisions — followed in 19 states

65019141920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Lake County v. Rollins · United States of America v. Lexington Mill & Elevator Company · Pollard v. Bailey · Fourth Nat Bank of City of New York v. Francklyn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 433 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n general, a party pursuing a statutory remedy must comply with all the procedures the statute mandates. As the Supreme Court put it ..., if a statute “creates a new liability and gives a special remedy for it, ... upon well-settled principles the limitations upon such liability become a part of the right conferred, and compliance with them is made essential to the assertion and benefit of the liability itself.””
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If no suit should be brought by the United States within six months from the completion and final settlement of said contract.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[I]t is elementary that an amendment [relates back] to the filing of the petition, and is to supply defects in the cause of action then existing, or at most to bring into the suit grounds of action which existed at the beginning of the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.