Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 U.S. 269 - Franklin v. Lynch

Franklin v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis

233 U.S. 269 · 1914

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
May 1948
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1948 · most notably Aaron Sage v. George Hampe (1914), United States v. Bartlett (1914)

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 23 state decisions

2201914192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Choate v. Trapp · Gritts v. Fisher · Starr v. Long Jim

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"As the tribe could not sell, neither could the individual members, for they had neither an undivided interest in the tribal land nor vendible interest in any particular tract.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.