Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 U.S. 630 - Smith v. State of Texas

Smith v. State of Texas’s Empirical Analysis

233 U.S. 630 · 1914

Citation profile

171
cited by 171 later decisions
15
cited 15 times by the Supreme Court
21
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 19 district · 84 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 171 later decisions (15 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2016 · most notably Pierce v. Society of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary Same (1925), Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia (1976)

12 federal appellate · 19 district · 84 state decisions — followed in 21 states

24019141920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Yick Wo v. Hopkins · M'Culloch v. State of Maryland · Mugler v. State of Kansas State of Kansas Tufts · Chicago Co v. City of Chicago · Joseph Lochner v. People of the State of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 171 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In so far as a man is deprived of the right to labor, his liberty is restricted, his capacity to earn wages and acquire property is lessened, and he is denied the protection which the law affords those who are permitted to work. Liberty means more than freedom from servitude, and the constitutional guaranty is an assurance that the citizen shall be protected in the right to use his powers of mind and body in any lawful calling.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “all men are entitled to the equal protection of the law in their right to work for the support of themselves and families.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.