Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 233 Va. 260 - Selected Risks Insurance v. Dean

Selected Risks Insurance v. Dean’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

130
cited by 130 later decisions
2
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 95 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 130 later decisions — most recently February 2017 · most notably Morrison v. Bestler (1990), Lowery v. Stovall (1996)

18 federal appellate · 95 state decisions

5601987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Haring v. Prosise · Bates v. Devers · Eagle, Star & British Dominions Insurance v. Heller · Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Bailey Lumber Co. · Smith v. New Dixie Lines, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 130 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In Virginia, the doctrine of stare decisis is more than a mere cliche. That doctrine plays a significant role in the orderly administration of justice by assuring consistent, predictable, and balanced application of legal principles. And when a court of last resort has established a precedent, after full deliberation upon the issue by the court, the precedent will not be treated lightly or ignored, in the absence of flagrant error or mistake.”
    15 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In Virginia, the settled rule is that a judgment of conviction or acquittal in a criminal prosecution does not establish in a subsequent civil action the truth of the facts on which it was rendered,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a litigant is generally prevented from invoking the preclusive force of a judgment unless he would have been bound had the prior litigation of the issue reached the opposite result.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.