Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 234 Ala. 385 - White v. Hale

White v. Hale’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2018

10 state decisions

60193719401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kelen v. Brewer · Silverstein v. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham · Upshaw v. Eubank · Altman v. Barrett · Smith v. Roney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “inadequacy of a remedy at law is one of the foundation stones of equity jurisdiction, and it is a fundamental rule that before a complainant is entitled to relief in a court of equity he must have no plain and adequate remedy at law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.