Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 234 Ala. 482 - MacMahon v. Baumhauer

MacMahon v. Baumhauer’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
7
states following
November 2001
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently November 2001 · most notably 456 So. 2d 249 - Ross v. Luton (1984), County Commissioners of Charles County v. ST. CHARLES ASSOCIATES LTD. (2001)

35 state decisions

12019371940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Holcomb v. Forsyth · Crowson v. Cody · City of Huntsville v. Gudenrath · Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. Murphy · Gulf States Steel Co. v. Christison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We are of the opinion that it would be unconscionable to permit a city which had required its citizens to destroy all other sanitary equipment, and compel connection with a public sewerage system, to deny them its use although all reasonable charges for water for domestic use was paid, by assessing an extra charge for allowing the same water to flow through such sewer, and for failure to pay such extra charge, disconnect and destroy the sewerage connection, and deny water service. This would be tantamount to taking property without due process of law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The rule of res adjudicata that obtains in this court (citing cases) is not to be applied as against Otto, his grantor, and those similarly situated.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.