Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 234 ARK 607 - Kerr v. Kerr

Kerr v. Kerr’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2023

14 state decisions

1001962197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grytbak v. Grytbak · Smith v. Smith · Lowrey, Administrator v. Yates · Mason v. Gates

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The plaintiff’s statement of her cause of action contains no reference to financial problems of any nature or kind. Nor does the complaint contain so much as a hint that any decree touching upon custody or support will be sought. It is apparent from the pleadings here that the plaintiff was seeking but one thing — a divorce. This being true, she cannot enlarge and broaden the scope of the action to include matters foreign to her complaint upon the default in appearance by the defendant.” 234 Ark. at 611 , 353 S.W.2d at 353 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““A judgment for plaintiff by default must strictly conform to, and be supported by, the allegations of the petition or complaint, a closer correspondence between pleading and judgment being necessary than after a contested trial. Defendant’s default does not enlarge or broaden plaintiff’s claim and rights under the allegations of the petition; nor may the allegations of the petition be enlarged by any evidence offered or introduced as confirmation of the default judgment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.