In Re Weinstein’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 341 · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 727 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz · European American Bank v. Benedict · Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz · Dombroff v. Greene (In Re Dombroff) · Dollinger v. Poskanzer (In Re Poskanzer)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“are to be interpreted strictly and in a manner consistent with the Code's policies in favor of providing a fresh start for the debtor and prompt administration of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Higgins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.