Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 234 CALAPP2D 423 - People v. King

People v. King’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
June 1973
most recently cited

36 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Ker v. State of California · United States v. Rabinowitz · Agnello v. United States · Silverman v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The circumstance that Sergeant Hitchings had to lower the position of his head to see through the opening is not a decisive factor ... since the propriety of the officer's action could not reasonably be held to depend upon the chance factor of the location of the uncovered portion of the window.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.