Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 234 F.2d 102 - Daniel v. United States

Daniel v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

234 F.2d 102 · 1956

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
September 2011
most recently cited

37 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently September 2011 · most notably Dixon v. Alabama State Board of Education (1961), United States v. $242,484.00 (2004)

37 federal appellate ·

1901956196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Costello v. United States · Diaz v. United States · Pennsylvania Co v. Chamberlain · Rex Trailer Company v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(b) Every person who shall use or engage in or cause to be used or engaged in any fraudulent trick, scheme, or device, for the purpose of securing or obtaining, or aiding to secure or obtain, for any person any payment, property, or other benefits from the United States, or any Government agency in connection with the disposition of property under this Act; or who enters into an agreement, combination, or conspiracy to do any of the foregoing— “(1) shall pay to the United States the sum of $2,000. for each such act, and double the .amount of any damage which the United States may have sustained by reason thereof, together with the costs of suit; or “(2) shall, if the United States shall so elect, pay to the United States, as liquidated damages, a sum equal to twice the consideration agreed to be given by such person to the United States or any Government agency; or “(3) shall, if the United States shall so elect, restore to the United States the property thus secured and obtained and the United States shall retain as liquidated damages any consideration given to the United States or any Government agency for such property.” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “our duty ... to view the testimony and inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the prevailing party below.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.