Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 234 F.2d 499 - Matter of the Application of Edward A. Patton and Forrest F. Beil

Matter of the Application of Edward A. Patton and Forrest F. Beil’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
January 1962
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Potts v. Creager · Pennsylvania Co v. Locomotive Engine Safety Truck Co · Ansonia Brass & Copper Co. v. Electrical Supply Co. · In re Lindberg · In re Switzer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““However, it is well settled that evidence of commercial success may be controlling only where the issue of patentability is otherwise doubtful [citing cases]. In the present case we have no doubt that invention is lacking. Therefore, the arguments relative to commercial success are not persuasive.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.