United States v. Kramel’s Empirical Analysis
234 F.2d 577 · 1956
Citation profile
41 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1989 · most notably United States 77-1359 v. Kimbell Foods Inc (1979), United States v. Hext (1971)
41 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 658
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance · Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States · Blair v. Commissioner · Morgan v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Setting to one side the question of constitutional power, is this Act to be construed as displacing State law governing or affecting titles to property and tort actions for claimed violation of property rights? We have searched through this entire Act to ascertain whether expressly or by fair implication any such broad purpose is indicated therein. Clearly, there is no direct expression to be found. Nor is there any such intention implied.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““This court has recently held that the State law governs in a situation like this, Sig Ellingson & Co. v. De Vries, 8 Cir., 199 F.2d 677 and Sig Ellingson & Co. v. Butenbach, 8 Cir., 199 F.2d 679 , certiorari denied in both cases 344 U.S. 934 , 73 S.Ct. 505 , 97 L.Ed. 719 ; and such is the holding of other courts.”,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“section 658 states a clear intention to protect the collateral given the Farmers Home Administration from conscious fraud.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.