Leiser v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
234 F.2d 648 · 1956
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2003
9 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 545 · 19 U.S.C. § 1496 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1497 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1498 (Tariff Act of 1930) · 19 U.S.C. § 1624 (Tariff Act of 1930)
Relies on United States v. 20 Strings Seed Pearls · Frankel v. Irwin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“overflew” the airport at Gander, it arrived in Boston contrary to the defendant's expectation. Id. at 648-49 . The defendant made arrangements to board the next available flight for Gander before any customs official approached him, and he failed to declare the diamonds in his possession. Id. at 649 . Given this failure, the diamonds were seized and the defendant was charged with customs violations. Id. at 648-49 . Thereafter, he was acquitted after trial, id. at 649 , and sought return of the diamonds asseverating, inter alia, that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“person arriving in the United States in order to ascertain what articles are contained therein and whether subject to duty, free of duty, or prohibited notwithstanding a declaration and entry therefor has been made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.