Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 234 F.2d 66 - Heltcel v. Skaggs

Heltcel v. Skaggs’s Empirical Analysis

234 F.2d 66 · 1956

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
November 1975
most recently cited

12 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 1975

12 federal appellate ·

80195619601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pearson v. Johnson · Frye v. Theige · Musselman v. Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. of Herman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “reads in terms of legal obligations covered and excluded, not bodily injuries or casualties, as in Pearson v. Johnson, supra, [215 Minn. 480, 10 N.W.2d 357].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.