Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 234 F.3d 1133 - Touchston v. McDermott

Touchston v. McDermott’s Empirical Analysis

234 F.3d 1133 · 2000

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 3 U.S.C. § 5 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Buckley v. Valeo · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Singleton v. Wulff · Reynolds v. Sims · National Association for Advancement of Colored People v. Y Button

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a party may not ordinarily claim standing to vindicate the constitutional rights of some third party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “is a prudential, rather than jurisdictional, rule of practice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.