Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 234 FSUPP 575 - Stokes v. Fortson

Stokes v. Fortson’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2016 · most notably Turner v. Fouche (1970), Wells v. Edwards (1973)

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

140196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 28 U.S.C. § 2281

Relies on Baker v. Carr · Reynolds v. Sims · McGowan v. State of Maryland Gallagher · Wesberry v. Sanders · Gray v. Sanders

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[T]he one man-one vote doctrine, applicable as it now is to selection of legislative and executive officials, does not extend to the judiciary. Manifestly, judges and prosecutors are not representatives in the same sense as are legislators or the executive. Their function is to administer the law, not to espouse the cause of a particular constituency. Moreover there is no way to harmonize selection of these officials on a pure population standard with the diversity in type and number of cases which will arise in various localities, or with the varying abilities of judges and prosecutors to dispatch the business of the courts. An effort to apply a population standard to the judiciary would, in the end, fall of its own weight."”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.