Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 234 Ga. 19 - Stack v. State

Stack v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
October 2001
most recently cited

46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2001 · most notably Godfrey v. Georgia (1980), State v. Chambers (1977)

46 state decisions

2301975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Giglio v. United States · Whitlock v. State · Commonwealth v. Jones · McNeal v. State · Creamer v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the [voir dire] examination, the counsel for either party shall have the right to inquire of the individual jurors examined touching any matter or thing which would illustrate any interest of the juror in the case, including any opinion as to which party ought to prevail, the relationship or acquaintance of the juror with the parties or counsel therefor, any fact or circumstance indicating any inclination, leaning, or bias which the juror might have respecting the subject matter of the action of the counsel of parties thereto, and the religious, social and fraternal connection of the juror.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`polygraph is a poisonous tree whose every fruit is forbidden',”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.