Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 234 Ga. 555 - Coker v. State

Coker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
8
cited 8 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions (8 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2015 · most notably Gregg v. Georgia (1976), Coker v. Georgia (1977)

6 federal appellate · 46 state decisions

37019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nebbia v. People of State of New York · Jarrell v. State · Dingler v. State · Coley v. State · Chenault v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In considering any given death sentence on appeal the Georgia Supreme Court is to determine whether the sentence imposed was consistent with the relevant statutes — i. e., whether there was sufficient evidence to support the finding of an aggravating circumstance. * * * However it must do much more than determine whether the penalty was lawfully imposed. It must go on to decide — after reviewing the penalties imposed in ‘similar cases’ — whether the penalty is ‘excessive or disproportionate’ considering both the crime and the defendant. * * * The new Assistant to the Supreme Court is to assist the court in collecting the records of ‘all capital felony cases’ in the State of Georgia in which sentence was imposed after January 1, 1970. * * * The Court also has the obligation of determining whether the penalty was ‘imposed under the influence of passion, prejudice or any other arbitrary factor.’ * * * The Georgia Supreme Court has interpreted the appellate review statute to require it to set aside the death sentence whenever juries across the State impose it only rarely for the type of crime in question; but to require it to affirm death sentences whenever juries across the State generally impose it for the crime in question. Thus in this case the Georgia Supreme Court concluded that the death penalty was so rarely imposed for the crime of robbery that it set aside the sentences on the robbery counts and effectively foreclosed that penalty from being imposed for that crime in t”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.