Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 234 Ga. App. 150 - Estes v. State

234 Ga. App. 150 - Estes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 2015

11 state decisions

80199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Waters v. State · 183 Ga. App. 17 - McGinnis v. State · 217 Ga. App. 328 - Lockett v. State · 230 Ga. App. 627 - Hawkins v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Estes' claim that any movement by the victim was merely incidental to the struggle, and thus constituted a mere positional change, is not supported by the evidence. The jury was authorized to conclude that Estes was trying to force the victim into her truck, and in fact succeeded in moving her a short distance toward that objective. Although Estes claims that this at most constitutes attempted kidnapping, the offense of kidnapping "is completed when the victim has been seized and asported to some degree." [Cit.] Because there was evidence that the victim was moved a short distance against her will, there was sufficient evidence of asportation to support Estes' kidnapping conviction. [17]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “is completed when the victim has been seized and asported to some degree.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.