Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 234 Ind. 691 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
November 1978
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 1978

14 state decisions

60195619601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kuhn v. State · Atkinson v. State · DOWLING v. State · Hoover v. State · Hart v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The issue is analogous to that which is ordinarily presented by plea in abatement. The rule is now well established that where a defendant files a plea in abatement, and there is a trial thereon resulting in a finding against defendant and an order that he plead over to the merits, such is not a final judgment which is subject to appeal, for it does not dispose of all the issues in the case as they affect the party involved. It is only when the defendant refuses to plead over and the court enters a judgment for want of an answer that a final judgment exists.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““... To be a ‘severable,’ ‘adjudicated’ issue, the issue must constitute such a distinct and definite branch of the case that a determination as to that issue reserves no further question or decision for further determination as to the party asking the appeal.....” Smith v. State (1956), 234 Ind. 691, 695 , 131 N. E. 2d 148 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.