Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 234 Iowa 884 - Fischer v. Klink

Fischer v. Klink’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
July 2005
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 2005

7 state decisions

401944195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schwartz v. Durham · Ridgeway v. Underwood · Puffer v. Welch · Bailey v. Allegheny National Bank · Robinson v. Saxon Mills

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Alta Klink, being entitled to one-twelfth of the proceeds of the sale of the land when made, had such an interest as was subject to assignment. Dating from the death of Christian Nelson the land had all the attributes of personal property, and except in the case of reconversion by agreement of all the heirs, the interest of each heir would be only an interest in the proceeds.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “unless a contrary intention is manifest or inferable, an assignment ordinarily carries with it all rights, remedies and benefits which are incidental to the thing assigned, except those which are personal to the assignor and for his benefit only.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(a)ny words or transaction which show an intention on one side to assign and an intention on the other to receive, if there is valuable consideration”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.