State v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 district · 29 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““In addition Kansas ha$ long held a statute will not be declared void for vagueness and uncertainty, where it employs words commonly used, previously judicially defined or haying a settled meaning in law. In re Brooks, 228 Kan. at 544 . ... A statute: js-also more readily upheld against a charge of vagueness if the offense is one,which requires a specific intent. See State v. Dunn, 233 Kan. at 421, 422; 21 Am. Jur. 2d, Criminal Law $ 17.” 234 Kan. at 1046 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. City of Wichita v. Lucero

2. ““The gravamen of the offense is clearly the impairment of visibility into the motor vehicle from the outside. Operators and owners of vehicles are clearly and sufficiently warned they cannot install one-way glass or apply other substances to the windshield and side windows of a car or other vehicle which prevents or impairs the ability to view the inside of the vehicle from the outside.” 234 Kan. at 1049-50 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Adams