Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 234 KAN 845 - Young v. Wheeler

Young v. Wheeler’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Burns v. Drake · Bourke v. Bourke · Gustafson v. Bowling · In Re Estate of Bowman · Gantz v. Bondurant

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'K.S.A. 59-2239 is a special statute of limitations. The words 'all demands' are all-inclusive and include claims and demands of every type and character against a decedent's estate except for those particular cases where the statute expressly provides otherwise. A party seeking to remove something from a decedent's estate must comply with the nonclaim statute in the absence of an express statutory exception such as set forth in K.S.A. 59-2239(2).'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “it is better policy to deny exceptions to the bar of the nonclaim statute rather than to impair its final effect by allowing exceptions, however meritorious.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.